The mini had arrived in Australia!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd1d8/bd1d82de5b884286c49fc338aaf166f23df56cbf" alt=""
The McCalls pattern was published in 1966. I love the claim on the front "Dressmaker Tested". Do you think that patterns today are dressmaker tested?
Here is my interpretation;
I made this dress a while ago, and clearly before I started worrying about such things as allowing extra fabric to match patterns... from memory, I did not actually have enough material, which is why the back doesn't match and the facings are a little dodgy. Perhaps I should have followed The Shrimp's lead, and just made the dress a little shorter (her solution to insufficient fabric).
I bought the fabric on my holiday to Paris, which was my last hoorah before having children. I was a little disappointed that I was in the capital of fashion and had not managed to buy any clothes. I tried to ask the hotel manager for directions to a fabric shop, but did not know the French for "fabric". Then on our second last day, we headed out to the 18th quartier to see Le Sacre-Coeur. That's where we stumbled into Dreyfus, a huge fabric store several stories high. I would go back to Paris just to return to this store (well, a few chocolate eclairs wouldn't go astray either). The fabric was a Thai silk (so perhaps I should just go to Thailand?) for AUD7/m. I loved it so much, I pieced together all the scraps and used them to make this bag.
2 comments:
I love it. Came here from Sewing Patterns. I haven't really tried much print fabric yet because of the matching problem. But hey, wear it in good health, it is fab.
I agree with busy91, I think it is a cute dress and not to worry about matching.
Post a Comment